Oxxidental Jottings

The new heading , relating to bovine teeth, is quite mystifying in the light of darkness. Only those of us suitably attired in formal ware should be able to comment on the erudite philosophies so often emanating from the hoi polloi of the northern Hemisphere under the guise of degustation and theatrical momentum. The aquisition of our country's vowels by our convict cousins across the Tasman has resulted in us diving into 'swmn pls'  while they dive into 'sweeeeeemin pooools' . Even our recently retired PM call us "Nw Zild".

Ciderman wrote:

The new heading , relating to bovine teeth, is quite mystifying in the light of darkness. Only those of us suitably attired in formal ware should be able to comment on the erudite philosophies so often emanating from the hoi polloi of the northern Hemisphere under the guise of degustation and theatrical momentum. The aquisition of our country's vowels by our convict cousins across the Tasman has resulted in us diving into 'swmn pls'  while they dive into 'sweeeeeemin pooools' . Even our recently retired PM call us "Nw Zild".

love to see you in "formal ware"- as the newly appointed spell checker from OZ has noted!

just finishing off me fush and chups at the moment mate!

Translation please.

It says us poms can't pronounce swimming pools proper even though we wear formal underpants

Or summat like that.

AlanHo wrote:

It says us poms can't pronounce swimming pools proper even though we wear formal underpants

Or summat like that.

OH!

Shucks.

The spelling of the new title of this thread doesn't bother me as it is obvious that the wording is deliberate, not just a spelling error.

AlanHo wrote:

It says us poms can't pronounce swimming pools proper even though we wear formal underpants

Or summat like that.

I like Y fronts, only tried one pair of boxer shorts and hated them.

Too much information.  This is a family forum....

My brother's girlfriend used to like wearing his Y fronts.
Could never see Y meself.

I was on a website recently where they kept talking about women knickers all the time - most distressing - some of the sizes quoted were astronomical - bit like the diary film 'bridget jones diary. ' can't see what enjoyable about it all - keep it under lock and key I say!

So you advocate chastity belts do you...?  Bit old fashioned methinks......

Nothing wrong with chastity belts, as long as they're made from chocolate 

Bad lad - but I like you...................

I once had a link [haven't we all] about old Baghdad before all the troubles - it had vast public libraries that were all destroyed in some war, and all religious groups were accommodated and welcomed in the city. but I digress - in the same article they talked about the sexy behaviors of the Baghdadians in those days - women of course were confined to the house but in the evening - o la la - it related that the women wore chastity like garments beautifully manufactured in edible materials which the husband would devour with passion. other garments had sparkling lights inserted rather like our xmas lights that twinkle on and off. all the items could be bought in Baghdad shops - now apart from keeping women in the home all day [and why not someone has to clean the bloody place] what is different from the West?

the monsoon rain is back again - lovely to see it but I have to make a run west soon for 200kms and the roads do get swamped quickly up  here - well it will be here or there that's for sure! I won't get all hung up about it